Roles and permissions: involve your whole company, each with their own scope

Involving every member of staff in quality means giving each person their fair scope of responsibility. Raisetalk separates what a user can do (their permissions) from what they can see (their place in the org chart). Three default roles are enough for most companies; a Roles screen lets you build custom ones. Under the hood, two established models combined: RBAC for permissions, ABAC for visibility.

Roles and access rights management in Raisetalk

Key takeaways on roles and access rights

  • Raisetalk draws a clear line between two questions: what a user is allowed to do (their permissions) and which data they are allowed to see (their scope). The first depends on their role, the second on their place in the org chart.
  • Three default roles cover most organisations: Administrator, Operational manager, Advisor. Ready to use, with no configuration at all.
  • Need to go further? A Roles screen lets you build custom roles: one label per language, a permissions matrix to tick, and role assignment delegated to the right owner.
  • Two established security models, combined: RBAC (permissions by role) and ABAC (visibility based on position in the org chart). One decides who can do what, the other who sees which data.
  • A role is never deleted: it is deactivated. Access is cut immediately, the role can no longer be assigned, and nothing of the history is lost.

Quality is everyone's business, not just the managers'

Quality monitoring is often thought of as a managers' tool: you install the platform, a few team leads log in, and advisors are kept away from their own data. That's a waste. An advisor who sees their conversations analysed, their strengths and their areas for improvement, progresses faster than an advisor debriefed once a month. This is where skills development really happens, as close to the front line as possible.

Involving everyone, however, means answering one simple question cleanly: who has access to what? Without a clear answer, two bad habits set in. Either you share a single account across the whole team, and traceability disappears. Or you open everything to everyone, and an advisor ends up viewing their colleagues' assessments, or the company's billing.

The right answer is neither "everything closed" nor "everything open". It's giving each person exactly their scope of responsibility: no more, no less. That is precisely what Raisetalk's Roles screen handles.

Three default roles, ready to use

Every organisation starts with three roles, designed to cover the vast majority of needs without the slightest adjustment.

RoleFor whomWhat they can doWhat they see
AdministratorThe person or people in charge of the toolEverything: settings, analysis grids, users, billing, and role managementThe entire organisation
Operational managerTeam managersFollow and create conversations, assess, steer their teams, receive managerial alertsTheir team and the teams attached below
AdvisorFront-line staffView their conversations, their assessments and their feedbackTheir own data only

This split is enough for most companies. An administrator configures and steers, a manager leads their teams, an advisor works on their own conversations. The default roles have labels managed by the application in each language, and the Administrator is a system role: its permissions cannot be changed and it can never be deactivated, to avoid locking yourself out of your own tool.

Raisetalk role management screen with each role's access level

Building a custom role as the organisation grows

Past a certain size, three roles are no longer enough. A "strategic manager" who steers without touching the grids, a "quality lead" who handles disputes without administering accounts, a "level 2 support" agent: every organisation has its nuances. Rather than forcing them into a mould, Raisetalk lets you create custom roles.

From the Roles menu, reserved by default for administrators, you create a role in a few moments:

  • One label per language, so that everyone sees the role in their own language. The technical key itself is generated automatically from the French label: nothing to enter.
  • A permissions matrix to tick, organised into clear families: Conversations, Grids and analyses, Automations, Reporting and discovery, Support, Organisation. You enable exactly what the role should be able to do, family by family.
  • Assignment delegation: each role generates its own assignment permission. You decide who, in the organisation, can grant this role to a user. A regional manager can thus manage the roles of their region without becoming an administrator of the whole company.
Permission matrix of a Raisetalk role, grouped by family

The Administrator column stays read-only: this system role keeps all its permissions, by design. For every other role, the matrix is your dashboard of authorisations, readable at a glance.

Deactivate a role, never delete it

A role carries users, a history, assessments. Deleting it would leave holes. Raisetalk therefore does not allow it: a role that has become useless is deactivated.

Deactivation has immediate and unambiguous effects:

  • Users with that role can no longer log in, and their current sessions are cut on the next request.
  • The role can no longer be assigned to new users.
  • It no longer receives team alerts.

Reactivation restores access just as quickly. The Administrator, once again, is the exception to the rule: it cannot be deactivated. The result: you adjust your organisation without ever fearing you'll lose data or lock yourself out.

Under the hood: RBAC and ABAC, the duo that secures the whole

Two access control models are the industry reference. Raisetalk relies on both, because they answer two different questions.

RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) answers "who can do what". Permissions are not attached to a person but to a role. You assign a role to a user, and they inherit all its permissions; you evolve the role, and everyone who carries it follows. This is exactly what the permissions matrix handles: assess a conversation, manage a grid, access reporting, handle a support request. One permission, one box, one role.

ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) answers "who sees which data". Here, access no longer depends on the role alone but on an attribute of the user: their position in the org chart. By default, everyone sees the data of their team and of the teams located below them in the hierarchy. A manager sees their managerial scope; the same role, placed higher in the org chart, sees more widely, without anything being reconfigured. The Advisor, meanwhile, is deliberately restricted to their own data alone, wherever they sit in the tree.

The combination is what makes the system both simple and safe. The role decides the actions; the org chart decides the data scope. You don't have to recreate a role per team: a single "Operational manager" role suits all your managers, each one seeing only their own scope. It's this coupling that lets you involve every member of staff without ever exposing data to the wrong recipient.

This scope-based logic actually extends beyond the company. For our integrator partners, such as SYD Digital Care, isolation by scope guarantees that one client instance never sees another's data, including through the Support module.

Getting started

  1. Log in to your Raisetalk workspace with an administrator account.
  2. In the menu, open Roles: there you'll find your three default roles and their users.
  3. Check that each member of staff carries the right role. For most teams, the three default roles are enough.
  4. Need a custom role? Click New role, name it in your languages, and tick its permissions in the matrix.

Giving each person their fair scope is the condition for quality to become everyone's business, and no longer just that of a few managers. The detail of the permissions, family by family, is described in the Roles and permissions documentation of your workspace.

A coral umbrella shelters a file labelled ACPR, with a form, an advice form and a call's sound wave coming out of it
Strategy 17 min

Insurance in France: what a defensible duty-to-advise file looks like in an ACPR inspection

For insurers, brokers and agents selling insurance in France, particularly by telephone. Since recommendation 2024-R-03, the duty to advise must be proven in writing for all insurance products, and in May 2026 the ACPR ruled that an oral exchange is not enough. Yet it is listening to the calls that brings advice forms down. The four documents of a defensible file, the consistency test between the written record and the call, and what an analysis tool does, or does not do, for you.

Continuous security monitoring at Raisetalk
Strategy 15 min

Is Raisetalk secure? What we measure, fix and publish

No open vulnerability, thirteen compliance frameworks in the green, and audit reports available on request from the footer. This article describes the machinery behind those claims: six surfaces analysed continuously, an application firewall in blocking mode, and a process in which no alert is ever closed by a machine. It then compares this approach with ISO 27001 certification and penetration testing, which complement it, but which come afterwards.

French law of 11 August 2026 on telephone canvassing
Strategy 18 min

France, 11 August 2026: cold calling moves to prior consent, and the burden of proof changes sides

Since 11 August 2026, calling a consumer in France without prior consent is prohibited and Bloctel is gone. Law no. 2025-594 and Decree no. 2026-662 impose four mandatory disclosures at collection, consent valid for twelve months with no tacit renewal, proof kept for three years, and expressly allow oral withdrawal during the call. The real change is the burden of proof: it now rests on the caller, and it sits inside their own recordings. The French text also reaches calls placed from abroad to French numbers.

Thousands of small blue tiles, of which only about thirty are lit up in coral
Quality Monitoring 14 min

Analysing 100% of calls: what the statistics say, and what it really costs

With 30 calls listened to a month, an 80% compliance rate in fact lies anywhere between 63% and 91%, and a ten-point drop cannot be told apart from chance. The calculation vendors do not show, the gap from which an action plan is justified, what analysing every call really changes, what it does not solve, and its cost per evaluated conversation.

Six rounded steps climb towards a large grid of tiles fully lit up in coral
Quality Monitoring 12 min

Moving to 100% quality monitoring: the six-step method

Moving from sample-based listening to analysing every call changes the method, not just the tool. Deciding what you measure, rewriting the scorecard, calibrating the analysis against your evaluators, prioritising alerts, budgeting by the minute and redeploying the quality team: the six steps, with the calibration protocol and the mistakes to avoid.

A coral thread starts from a checklist of ticked boxes and draws a heart
Quality Monitoring 17 min

Quality Monitoring: are you more "procedural" or "relational"?

A procedural scorecard checks that the advisor introduced themselves, rephrased and closed the call. A relational approach looks at what the call produced for the customer: a problem solved, a commitment kept, a reason to trust. What research says, our stance inspired by the Agile Manifesto, how to measure the relationship without measuring emotion, and a test to place your own set-up.

Upload a call. Read its analysis. Five minutes.

Sign up in seconds, with no credit card and no cookies. A welcome tour walks you through the key principles, then you add your first conversation.

Early access · Your feedback shapes the product