Speech-to-Text: which model(s) to choose for analyzing your conversations?

Quality Monitoring, Sales Compliance, Voice of Customer: the choice of transcription model determines the reliability of your analyses. Comparison of the 8 STT models available on Raisetalk, with our recommendations by use case.

Choosing a speech-to-text model for conversation analytics

Key takeaways on choosing a speech-to-text model

  • Best overall score: Light and Best - versatile, all durations, all features
  • If pseudonymization is mandatory: stick with Light, Best or Gemini models - Parakeet, Voxtral and Whisper don't offer it
  • For the best diarization at the best price: Voxtral - top quality and diarization, lowest cost on the market. Read our dedicated article
  • For the best diarization without pseudonymization: Parakeet - perfect score in diarization and time drift
  • For complex support with all features: Gemini 2.5 Pro - best quality and diarization, but slower and more expensive
  • Watch end-of-life dates: Gemini 2 Flash ends February 5, 2026, Gemini 2.5 Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro end June 17, 2026

What is Speech-to-Text and why is it crucial?

Speech-to-Text (STT) is the first step in any conversational analysis: it transforms your call audio into usable text. The quality of this transcription directly impacts the reliability of all subsequent analyses - whether for Quality Monitoring, Sales Compliance or Voice of Customer insights.

At Raisetalk, we now offer 8 different STT models to cover all use cases. But how do you choose the right one?

Quick glossary before we start

  • Diarization: ability to identify and distinguish different speakers in a conversation ("who speaks when")
  • Time drift: progressive offset between transcribed text and the actual moment words were spoken - problematic for syncing text with audio
  • Pseudonymization: automatic replacement of personal data (names, numbers, addresses, etc.) with ### strings in compliance with GDPR

What criteria should guide your STT model choice?

Six main criteria should guide your choice:

CriterionWhat it measuresBusiness impact
Text qualityTranscription accuracyAnalysis reliability
DiarizationSpeaker identificationAttributing statements to the right speaker
Time driftText/audio synchronizationPrecise navigation in recordings
Long durationsHandling calls > 10 minRelevance for support
CostPrice per transcribed minuteBudget control
FeaturesTranslation, pseudonymization, operating regionsCompliance and multilingualism

What models are available on Raisetalk?

Here's the complete comparison of the 8 available STT models, ranked by total score:

#ModelRegionDurationTrans.Pseudo.CostSpeedQualityDiarizationDriftBonusTotal
1LightEU & USAll✅✅4/55/54/53/55/5+2041
2BestEU & USAll✅✅2/55/55/53/55/5+2040
3Gemini 2 FlashEU & US< 10 min✅✅5/55/54/54/52/5+1636
3Gemini 2.5 FlashEU & US< 25 min✅✅4/54/54/54/53/5+1736
4Gemini 2.5 ProEU & US< 45 min✅✅1/51/55/55/54/5+1935
5VoxtralEU< 30 min❌❌5/55/55/55/55/5+833
6ParakeetEUAll❌❌3/55/54/55/55/5+830
7WhisperEUAll❌❌3/55/53/55/55/5+829

Legend: all scores are out of 5, higher is better. The feature bonus rewards multi-region availability, long duration support, translation and pseudonymization.

Which model for prospecting and qualification?

Our recommendation: Light (if pseudonymization required) or Parakeet (if diarization is priority)

For prospecting calls, Sales Compliance is often a key issue: verifying that sales reps follow the script, present legal disclaimers, and don't make non-contractual promises. Two approaches depending on your constraints:

Light is the versatile choice:

  • Highest total score: best overall value
  • All features: translation and pseudonymization included
  • Maximum speed: near-instant results
  • All durations supported: no practical limit
  • Controlled cost: economical for high volumes

Parakeet is the specialized choice if diarization is critical:

  • Perfect diarization: clear distinction between speakers - essential for attributing statements to the rep vs the prospect
  • No time drift: precise navigation in the recording to replay a passage
  • Maximum speed: near-instant results

Parakeet's constraint: no pseudonymization or translation, and only available in the Europe region.

Which model for sales teams?

Our recommendation: Best or Gemini 2.5 Flash

Sales conversations are longer and more complex than prospecting. They serve Quality Monitoring (evaluating sales techniques, commercial process compliance), Voice of Customer (objections, expressed needs, buying signals) and of course Sales Compliance, especially in banking and insurance. They require a balance between quality, diarization and advanced features.

Best is the premium choice:

  • Best text quality: maximum precision on business terms and customer objections
  • No time drift: perfect synchronization for targeted replay
  • All durations supported: no practical limit
  • All features: translation and pseudonymization included

Gemini 2.5 Flash offers a good compromise:

  • Better diarization than Best - useful for clearly distinguishing sales rep and customer
  • More cost-effective than Best
  • Durations up to 25 minutes: covers most commercial calls

Warning: Gemini 2.5 Flash has slight time drift (3/5 vs 5/5 for Best). If audio/text synchronization is critical for your evaluations, prefer Best.

Which model for customer support and long conversations?

Our recommendation: Best (balance) or Gemini 2.5 Pro (maximum quality)

Technical support calls can last 30, 45 minutes or more. They're a goldmine for Voice of Customer (pain points, feature requests, satisfaction) and Quality Monitoring (procedure compliance, resolution quality, empathy). Every word counts.

Best is often the best choice:

  • Maximum transcription quality: precision on technical vocabulary and expressed signals
  • No time drift: perfect synchronization to replay key moments
  • All durations supported: no limit, even for very long calls
  • Speed: near-instant results

Gemini 2.5 Pro is justified if diarization is critical:

  • Perfect diarization vs Best: crucial when multiple speakers alternate (transfers, escalations)
  • Maximum transcription quality: equivalent to Best
  • Durations up to 45 minutes: covers most support calls

Gemini 2.5 Pro's trade-off: it's the most expensive and slowest model. Reserve it for conversations where multi-speaker diarization is non-negotiable.

Why do Light and Best dominate the ranking?

Light and Best lead the overall ranking thanks to their versatility:

AdvantageLightBest
All durations✅✅
All regions (EU & US)✅✅
Translation✅✅
Pseudonymization✅✅
Speed5/55/5
No time drift5/55/5
Text quality4/55/5
Cost4/52/5

In summary:

  • Light: best value for high volumes - ideal for analyzing 100% of conversations for Voice of Customer
  • Best: best text quality for demanding cases - perfect for Quality Monitoring and Sales Compliance

Best has no announced end-of-life date; Light's is set for April 13, 2026 (see the schedule below).

When to choose Parakeet or Whisper?

These two models share similar characteristics: excellent diarization, no time drift, maximum speed, and support for all durations. But they offer neither translation nor pseudonymization, hence their lower total score.

Parakeet is recommended if:

  • Perfect diarization is your absolute priority
  • You don't need pseudonymization
  • You're in the Europe region

Whisper is not recommended at this time for production use on Raisetalk.

Whisper (faster-Whisper-large-v3-turbo) has lower transcription quality compared to Parakeet. We offer it for:

  • Comparative testing
  • Users who already know it and want to compare

What end-of-life dates should you anticipate?

Some models have a scheduled end-of-life. Here's the timeline:

ModelEnd-of-life date
Gemini 2 Flash⚠️ February 5, 2026
Gemini 2.5 FlashJune 17, 2026
Gemini 2.5 ProJune 17, 2026
LightApril 13, 2026
Best, Voxtral, Parakeet, WhisperNo date announced

If you're using Gemini 2 Flash, plan your migration now to Gemini 2.5 Flash or another model.

These dates are subject to change. We'll keep you informed of any updates.

Need help choosing?

Our team can help you identify the optimal configuration based on your volumes, budget and quality requirements.

You can also test for yourself on our trial space: https://app.raisetalk.com/try

AssemblyAI Universal transcription models
AiForGood 8 min

AssemblyAI Universal: three new transcription models now available

Raisetalk rolls out three new AssemblyAI models: Universal 2, Universal 3 Pro and Universal 3.5 Pro. A new transcription generation, native GDPR pseudonymization, EU & US regions and context biasing for your business vocabulary. Find out which one to choose.

Thousands of small blue tiles, of which only about thirty are lit up in coral
Quality Monitoring 14 min

Analysing 100% of calls: what the statistics say, and what it really costs

With 30 calls listened to a month, an 80% compliance rate in fact lies anywhere between 63% and 91%, and a ten-point drop cannot be told apart from chance. The calculation vendors do not show, the gap from which an action plan is justified, what analysing every call really changes, what it does not solve, and its cost per evaluated conversation.

Six rounded steps climb towards a large grid of tiles fully lit up in coral
Quality Monitoring 12 min

Moving to 100% quality monitoring: the six-step method

Moving from sample-based listening to analysing every call changes the method, not just the tool. Deciding what you measure, rewriting the scorecard, calibrating the analysis against your evaluators, prioritising alerts, budgeting by the minute and redeploying the quality team: the six steps, with the calibration protocol and the mistakes to avoid.

A coral thread starts from a checklist of ticked boxes and draws a heart
Quality Monitoring 17 min

Quality Monitoring: are you more "procedural" or "relational"?

A procedural scorecard checks that the advisor introduced themselves, rephrased and closed the call. A relational approach looks at what the call produced for the customer: a problem solved, a commitment kept, a reason to trust. What research says, our stance inspired by the Agile Manifesto, how to measure the relationship without measuring emotion, and a test to place your own set-up.

A coral umbrella shelters a file labelled ACPR, with a form, an advice form and a call's sound wave coming out of it
Strategy 17 min

Insurance in France: what a defensible duty-to-advise file looks like in an ACPR inspection

For insurers, brokers and agents selling insurance in France, particularly by telephone. Since recommendation 2024-R-03, the duty to advise must be proven in writing for all insurance products, and in May 2026 the ACPR ruled that an oral exchange is not enough. Yet it is listening to the calls that brings advice forms down. The four documents of a defensible file, the consistency test between the written record and the call, and what an analysis tool does, or does not do, for you.

Upload a call. Read its analysis. Five minutes.

Sign up in seconds, with no credit card and no cookies. A welcome tour walks you through the key principles, then you add your first conversation.

Early access · Your feedback shapes the product